Bureaucratic Bungling or Something Worse?

After years of prudent spending and tax cuts that spurred the economy, when Governor Cooper took office, the Department of Transportation was rolling in cash to build highways.

Governor Cooper’s appointees decided to spend it all – which is the single activity Democrats excel at.

After a few months, with the coffers emptying, DOT decided it would borrow another $300 million using the Build NC Bonds.

Now, to issue a bond you must tell people about any pending financial liabilities you have that may get in the way of your repaying the bonds. And for DOT that’s where things got sticky. Because back in 2016 the State Supreme Court had issued a unanimous decision against DOT in the ‘Map Act’ lawsuit, saying DOT had taken private property without compensating people and it had to pay everyone back for their losses.

When DOT issued those bonds, it admitted it had already paid $220 million to settle those claims – which was true – but then added any future claims were not ‘material’. In other words, they told the bond buyers that future Map Act settlements would be too minor to impact DOT’s ability to repay the $300 million.

DOT borrowed and spent the $300 million then got a shock: It suddenly found it was strapped for cash with red ink piling up.

Seeking a bailout, DOT bureaucrats rushed over to the legislature but this time they told a different story: They said they needed $360 million dollars because they’d been ambushed by ‘unexpected’ Map Act payments.

Imagine if you went down to your bank and borrowed $100 thousand to buy a house but hid the fact that you owed another $100 thousand to settle a lawsuit. You’d have some explaining to do.

So how does DOT get away with saying in June that Map Act payments were not material to repaying a $300 million-dollar bond, but then, four months later, telling the legislature it urgently needs $360 million due to Map Act payments?

At this rate, The Swamp may drain itself.

A Trust Fund, A Couple of Billion Dollars and The Raleigh Swamp

In the private sector, few things will land you in hot water quicker than dipping into someone else’s trust fund to get your hands on cash – we’ve all heard about lawyers who took money out of a trust fund then, in the blink of an eye, ended up disbarred.

The state of North Carolina has what’s called the Highway Trust Fund – a public version of a private trust fund – which has money sitting in it that belongs to taxpayers across North Carolina.

Now, under state law, the money in that trust fund can only be used to do two things: 1) Pay for long-term road building; and 2) In emergencies, when DOT lands in a financial jam, for loans to bail DOT out.

However, those loans can only be made with the approval of the State Treasurer. He’s the Keeper of the Public Purse.

Two years ago, after Governor Cooper was elected, DOT went on a spending spree – it spent $1.8 billion it had in the bank, borrowed $300 million (using bonds) more. As part of all that, the Governor’s folks borrowed $1.1 billion from the Highway Trust Fund and spent it.

What did the Treasurer say about that loan? Nothing. DOT just raided the trust fund without his approval.

Next, after blowing through billions in cash, DOT got a shock: It discovered it had spent too much. It was in a ditch. Watching red ink pile up.

So what did the big spenders at DOT do? They stopped needed projects and laid off hundreds of workers so their legislative allies would give them another $660 million to spend. Immediately.

I know some people hate the term but that’s why it’s called ‘The Raleigh Swamp.’

That’s How Government Works

Two years ago, when Governor Cooper took office the Department of Transportation (DOT) was rolling in cash – $2 billion in cash.

The Governor promptly decided he ought to spend the money as fast as possible – because having less cash on hand meant DOT would be able to borrow another $300 million (using Build NC bonds) and spend it too.

Democrats excel at spending money and cash flew out the door and the Department borrowed the $300 million – then DOT got a shock: It found it had overspent. It was in a ditch. With red ink piling up.

DOT said, We’ll lay off workers and stop road repairs. Then DOT added, By the way, none of this is our fault. We got hit with unexpected bills like the Map Act lawsuit. The department’s allies in the legislature launched a bill to give DOT another $660 million – immediately.

The Map Act is the lawsuit DOT lost because it had taken people’s private property without compensating them.

The pitch supporting DOT sounded good but, when you scratched the surface, it didn’t hold water. Because DOT had lost the Map Act lawsuit three years ago – so it had known about those liabilities before it went on its spending spree.

Spend and spend then borrow and spend more and then, when you land in a ditch, come up with an excuse and say, Don’t blame us. Just give us another $660 million to spend.

And, of course, if the legislature says, Okay. Here’s $660 million. No problem – DOT is likely to just keep on spending like there’s no tomorrow and history will repeat itself.

That’s how government works.

And another reason to drain the Raleigh Swamp.

Cash Management and the Raleigh Swamp

The state Highway Department blew through a whopping $1.8 billion in cash in just 20 months – and now it’s laying off hundreds of workers and cancelling road repairs people need.

The DOT says its cash problems are due to a lawsuit it lost. Let’s look at two facts about that lawsuit: First, the NC Supreme Court ruling in that case goes back three years to June of 2016 – before DOT went on its spending spree.

Second, DOT lost the lawsuit because it violated property owners’ rights (trying to take their land). Our highest court stated that DOT must ‘determine the value of the loss of these fundamental rights’.

Bottom line: DOT knew about the lawsuit but spent the $1.8 billion anyway – and, now, here come the demands, ‘Give DOT more cash.’

Let’s drain the Raleigh Swamp, too.

Senator Andy Wells to Run for Lieutenant Governor

Statement by Senator Andy Wells:

“Earlier this year, in a single month, 130,000 illegal immigrants poured across our border. But, here in North Carolina, Democratic sheriffs in our biggest counties refused to cooperate with federal law enforcement to deport illegals who were arrested for crimes. It’s crazy.

“Republicans in the General Assembly passed a bill to stop Sanctuary Sheriffs. But Governor Cooper vetoed the bill.

“Governor Cooper also vetoed the budget Republicans passed – because he wanted to spend more. A lot more.

“But, this time, there is good news: With no budget the State continues to spend the same amount it did last year. Spending can’t go up. So Governor Cooper can’t increase spending.

“I am running for Lt. Governor to stand up for conservative principles – for less government, less spending and for stopping Sanctuary Sheriffs – just as I have in the Senate.”

Bang Down the Gavel

The budget deadlock’s gone on so long even liberal Democrats are complaining legislators are being paid to sit in Raleigh and do nothing which has cost taxpayers a million dollars.

Of course, there’s a twist here: Democrat legislators are just ramping up the pressure to make Republicans pass Governor Cooper’s budget which increases spending – so we can go home.

I’ve got a counterproposal for them: Let’s adjourn. Period.

After all, the Governor’s veto (because we spent hundreds of millions less than he wanted) means there is no budget. Which means the state spending can’t go up at all. By law the state has to spend the same amount it did last year.

It’s simple: No budget means less spending which means less government. And taxpayers save money.

So next time a Democrat stands up and says, Let’s adjourn, let’s bang down the gavel and do it. Right then.

Unintended Consequences

It wasn’t exactly what the Governor had in mind, but when he vetoed the state budget (because it didn’t spend enough) he actually cut spending. How’s that?

The Republican budget the General Assembly passed raised spending 3.4% – or $800 million.

Governor Cooper didn’t think that was enough spending – he wanted more government. So, he vetoed the Republican Budget.

What happened next? So far, the House hasn’t been able to override the Governor’s veto, and Republicans won’t pass the Governor’s budget. So, there is no budget.

What does that mean? When there’s no budget by law the state continues to spend the same amount it did last year – which means state spending is now lower than the budget Republicans passed and a lot lower than the Governor’s budget.

And if, like me, you think big government isn’t the answer to every problem that’s not an alarming outcome.

Governor Cooper’s veto had unintended consequences. He wanted more spending but instead he’s given us less spending – saving taxpayers $2.5 billion. Here’s my suggestion: The Legislature should bang down the gavel, adjourn, and go home and leave it at that – which would save taxpayers $2.5 billion.

Education Bureaucracy

Every year the state sends millions of dollars to local school systems across North Carolina to help them pay for school supplies. This year’s budget is $47 million. Now, State Superintendent Mark Johnson wants to send $37 million of that $47 million straight to classroom teachers, instead of school system administrators. And the education bureaucracy isn’t happy. Because teachers will get to spend $37 million that their bosses spent last year.

Fighting to keep control of that $37 million, school administrators are arguing they can spend the money better than teachers, that a centralized government bureaucracy makes bulk purchases at a better price, stores supplies in warehouses, and then distributes them when, and to whom, they decide needs them.

That argument took me back to the 1970s, when factories in Japan were selling products at a lower price than American manufacturers. Our manufacturers faced a big challenge. They had to lower the costs of their products and, to do that, they made an innovative change in their supply chain (which, in part, was copied from Japan). It was called the Just-In-Time (JIT) supply model, and it was a dramatic departure from the old practice of buying mountains of supplies and storing them in massive warehouses until the day came when they were needed.

How well did manufacturers’ new JIT plan work? According to an article in The Economist, US companies “gained over the following five years (on average) a 70% reduction in inventory, a 50% reduction in labor costs and an 80% reduction in space requirements.” And that happened long before the age of desktop computers, smart phones, and being able to order supplies on the Internet.

Of course, that kind of streamlined (and less expensive) supply system doesn’t appeal much to a centralized government bureaucracy. To put it bluntly, cutting costs means fewer administrators on a 30-year career path leading to a six-figure pension and free medical insurance for life.

Unlike entrepreneurial American factories in the 1970s, government bureaucrats see change as a threat to be avoided. School choice is one example: It allows parents to pick a school that is best for their child’s needs. But the education bureaucracy fought that change for years.

Superintendent Mark Johnson’s new plan to put the money to purchase classroom supplies in the hands of teachers isn’t popular with the education bureaucracy. But, like School Choice, it means a better education for our children.

School Supplies

Every school year, we read stories in the newspapers about teachers who have to spend their own money to buy school supplies for their classrooms. But, it turns out, only part of the story has been in the newspapers.

Taxpayers spend $9.5 billion on K-12 education. And, every year, part of that money – $50 million – is sent to local school boards to pay for supplies for classrooms. But, in the past, that $50 million hasn’t gone straight to classroom teachers. Instead, the money was paid to local school boards – which turned out to be a mistake.  Because, all too often, local bureaucrats decided not to spend the money on school supplies.

What did they spend it on? The answer to that question isn’t simple – it varies from school district to school district. But the short answer is bureaucrats used the money to pay for other things on their to do list – and left teachers paying for their own classroom supplies.

When I learned that money appropriated to pay for school supplies wasn’t being spent on school supplies, I asked, Why don’t we send the money straight to teachers? And, this week, we’re introducing a bill to do just that: Under our Senate bill, every licensed teacher in North Carolina will receive $400 to pay for classroom supplies – and bureaucrats will no longer be able to take that money and spend it on something else.

A Website That Doesn’t Work

Most people understand running a business is hard work. And, after doing it for years, most find it’s worth the sacrifice. That said, it’s maddening when a business is running smoothly and then, after years of hard work, it’s hit with a new tax or regulation – productivity drops and, suddenly, a new struggle starts to comply with a new government mandate.

In January that happened to business across North Carolina, when the State of North Carolina ordered them to file 1099s on-line. No more paper sounded okay. Filing bureaucratic forms on-line makes sense. Properly set up, it’s faster for businesses and reduces manual processing in the tax collector’s office. But hardly anything government does turns out to be simple and this was no exception.

The tax collector’s new 1099 system was not faster or more efficient. It was the opposite. It did not work with popular small business accounting software and businesses could not simply upload their information.

So, now, along with all the other headaches that come with filing tax returns small businessmen, bookkeepers and accountants are pulling their hair out trying to figure out how to file a 1099 online.

In this day and age, setting up a web site is no big feat – so why can’t a state agency with a $271 million budget set up a website that works? Is it an example of government ineptitude? Or could it be that filing 1099s online means the department will need fewer employees – and what government bureaucracy wants that?

The Department of Revenue has given us one more proof of the old saying, ‘More government isn’t the solution – it’s the problem.’