If you wonder why I talk about cutting spending, take a look at the chart below and consider the inheritance we are leaving our children. We went seriously off-track in 2000 and it’s time for a course correction. , or simply click on the chart itself.
This chart is one slide of a presentation by Jeff Gundlach of Doubleline Funds titled “The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.” If you are interested in an investment based analysis of our political efforts, it’s worth a look at the link below:
96th House District
After a hurricane, before you rebuild, you have to clear away the debris.
Here in Hickory we are in the midst of a man-made hurricane — an economic disaster— and before we can rebuild we, literally, have to clear away the debris.
A look at our community shows what I mean: We drive by old buildings, vacant buildings, shuttered furniture factories once filled by businesses and deserted houses and mobile homes where families once lived who have left our community because there are no longer jobs for them.
Those old, vacant buildings are the debris of our economic crash. They are privately owned — so why are they a public issue?
Because public policy is standing in the way of cleaning up the debris by making the cost to demolish an antiquated factory higher than the market can bear. Here’s how it works: Recently, I requested bids to demolish a long outdated building for a client. I also asked the contractors to separate the cost of actual demolition (and transport of the debris) from the government imposed fees charged at the landfill.
When the bids came back I received a shock. The landfill fees represented half the cost — they cost as much as the demolition, the loading and the hauling away of the debris combined. Which is one reason antiquated buildings are sitting vacant instead of being removed to provide space for new buildings.
The solution is straightforward: For government to waive the landfill tipping fees for a “Spring Cleaning” so it will be easier for property owners to go to work cleaning up our community.
Imagine the result of cutting the cost of removing a dilapidated building in half. Or, to put it another way, see what happens when we get government out of the way of the private sector.
This one change in government policy would lead to construction jobs and grading jobs and trucking jobs at little public cost.
It’s an odd but logical fact: We tax those that demolish obsolete buildings — so we have streets lined with antiquated buildings which are standing in the way of revitalizing our community and rebuilding our neighborhoods into a promising future.
I’ve had the opportunity to speak to some of you and you have heard my main issue is the job losses facing our community.
Below is what those job losses look like in chart form:
The chart above was drawn using data available to anyone on the NC Employment Security Commission web site. It only goes back to 1990 but clearly we have returned to job levels of 25+ years ago.
This is average annual employment so the 2011 numbers are not complete and posted.
Also, the annual averages represent a lower than actual total drop in jobs. Our peak employment in June 2000 of 183,837 is 40,041 jobs above where we were this past October when we hit 143,796. And that latest jobs number is 2,749 jobs lower than in October a year ago (please forgive me if I round that to 3000 when speaking).
You may wonder why I am talking about jobs when the news always talks about the unemployment rate.
Jobs tell us how many people are actually working. Jobs drive the local economy. Everything from retail sales to the value of your home to local tax revenues depend on a healthy jobs environment.
The unemployment percentage is a little different. The unemployment rate is a comparison of the total Labor Force compared to those unemployed folks that are looking for work. The thing is, if everyone that didn’t have a job suddenly stopped looking, you might read in the paper that unemployment was zero, but it would not be a good thing.
So, jobs, not the unemployment rate is what we need to pay attention to.
I am not telling you this to depress you. I am sharing this because knowledge is power.
Before we can correct a problem, we must understand, define and clarify that problem.
I look forward to continuing our conversation and I need your help and support.
On a more positive note…
Hickory and the surrounding area is blessed with an abundance of gifts. While we are less than an hour from the Charlotte airport and situated at the crossroads of I-40 and US Highway 321, we are minutes away from incredible natural beauty.
Unlike many areas of the region, we have an abundance of clean water. That is both an opportunity and a responsibility. We need leaders that understand the benefits of promoting that water resource while protecting its quality and defending it from those water-short areas that will take our water for their own purposes if it is possible.
We have considerable room for business expansion capability in our highway, water, sewer and electric infrastructure.
We have a labor force that is both skilled and willing to work.
The total of those assets make us unique and there is no reason we shouldn’t thrive.
What we need is aggressive leadership that will turn those assets into jobs.
My wife looked up at me last Thursday and asked, “Why is it you think the North Carolina Legislature is capable of passing major tax reform when they cannot even pass a bill to eliminate unnecessary safety inspections of new cars?”
We were having breakfast and reading about how a legislative committee had, the previous day, killed a bill to end annual safety inspections for new cars less than three years-old cars likely still under the manufacturer’s warranty and for which there are no data indicating any safety hazard.
The spokesman for that legislative committee pontificated, in effect, on how these inspections were a necessary jobs bill for the inspection garages. Based on news reports, no one in the legislature disagreed. It was only the media that later talked about the unnecessary expense and waste of time for the average citizen.
Now I am all for jobs. But we don’t create jobs or a vibrant economy when the government starts picking winners and losers by forcing some people to spend their money so that other folks can make more money.
I’m with the media on this one. It’s not so much about cars as it is doing the right thing just because it is the right thing. If our leaders can’t figure out how to do the right thing on the simple issues, how do we ever hope to handle the hard issues?
There are many complex issues facing our government. Many of them are and should be about creating jobs and growing the economy. It is my belief that a priority should be restructuring our state tax system to take out the very things, like car inspections, that get in the way of job creation and growing our economy.
The boost tax reform would give our ailing economy is obvious. But, as my wife pointed out, eliminating unnecessary car inspections seemed pretty obvious too – and one special interest stopped it dead in its tracks.